On:7/9/2007 6:42:50 PM - Alex Ford wrote:
Quote:
|
I still do not see why you did post this comment, as it has nothing to do with the topic.
|
To list some reasons for both yourself and anyone else reading this thread as to why an "all FLASH" web site might not be a good idea.
Quote:
|
I prefer FLASH because you can make much more attractive websites.
|
And these sites often take (much) longer to load and display, and typically remove a lot, if not all control from the site visitor.
You might think that a FLASH web site is more attractive, but do your site visitors think that the annoyance of "all FLASH" is sufficiently offset by the "attractiveness"? Yeah, you said you don't care about the needs of your site visitors. What a great way to say what you can do as advertising for your skills.
IMO, there are basically two groups who seem to like "all FLASH" web sites. 1.) Web design companies that offer "cutting edge technology" and 2.) some people looking to obtain their first site. These first time buyers like FLASH because they like what they see. But they rarely give a thought as to
why a visitor is coming to the site (typically to obtain information or to make a purchase-or-not decision) or to how their site visitors are going to react to the FLASH site.
An all FLASH site does have a place - a site that sells to kids (they like all that flashy blinky moving jumping song-and-dance color-changing animated stuff) or a site that is an entertainment service, like this one
http://www.cher.com/ which I think was particularly well done and the FLASH design seems appropriate to the web site's purpose.
FWIW. JMO. YMMV. TIOLI. DWYW.
----------
Jim B. :> )
If you have nothing to say, stop talking.